The Way of the inner Master
..The Master is an inner presence that helps the aspirant’s gradual
development. He appears as an inspiration first, then as an intuitive idea and
finally as the inner dialogue between two points of the same conscience. Only
in the stages close to the real Initiation the extra-conscious contact between
the Disciple and the Master occurs and it does almost exclusively for reasons
of ‘service to the common welfare’.
Preamble to the idea of conscience
The Master is an inner presence that helps the aspirant’s gradual
development. He appears as an inspiration first, then as an intuitive idea and
finally as the inner dialogue between two points of the same conscience. Only
in the stages close to the real Initiation the extra-conscious contact between
the Disciple and the Master occurs and it does almost exclusively for reasons
of ‘service to the common welfare’.
Religious books often use the inner dialogue to support the truthfulness of
their prophet. The dialogues reported are those with the divine conscience;
from them the religious precepts of the relevant faith are originated. These
precepts are usually not very important because those dialogues are the
product of two different points of the seer’s conscience.
Among the most representative Books, in the West we can mention the Timeus
of Plato (whose real name was Aristocles) as a reading of old
wisdom. In the East we can mention the Bhagavad Gita
for the depth of the metaphors between the warrior spirit of Arjuna and Srî
Krisna.
To make it simpler, let’s say that the first important contact in the
ordinary conscience is between the aspirant’s mind and the sense of subtle
conscience. Someone called it quite suitably the voice in the silence.
By developing the inner potentialities, the contact can move to the outside
and communicate with other high degree auras. This can only happen through the
activation of a forced series of minor links (the so-called Bridges) that make
up a bigger one between ordinary and subtle conscience. In order to concretize
these ‘bridges of communication’ between different aspects of the
same conscience, it is necessary to develop mental abilities; the mind is indeed
the only means between physical and subtle conscience.
The subtle conscience is the plane of existence of the soul and the soul expresses
itself through a mental focus that in the West is called superior Ego. In the
East the plane where the subtle conscience starts is called buddhic, after Buddha
that means wisdom.
The superior Ego is part of the super-consciousness and it is different from
the physical self (limited in time) because it is an imperishable aspect. Whilst
the physical personality, linked to the physical body, must dissolve in order
to re-generate, the subtle conscience, linked to the conscience of the soul,
preserves the qualities of the nucleus.
Who are guides, instructors and lower masters?
They are not proper Masters, although if we compare them to the common sense
they appear as illuminated men. A Master in the highest sense of the word is
beyond the threshold of illumination and he rules whole human departments.
When the concept of ‘initiatory Mastership’ goes from the exterior
goal to the inner condition, the adept
has made his decision. We can say that once overcome the point of ‘no
return’ he abandons for good the profane point of view, which focuses
on conflicts, ideological formulas and appearances. He perceives that the source
of wisdom he is looking for is inside him, not outside. As it says on an old
Commentary: “…only by progressing in himself the initiate will be
able to see the eternal cosmic…” It is indeed a ‘contact of
conscience’; therefore the source of perennial wisdom and the principle
called inner master are the same.
Many old ritual words have been absorbed in modern systems that have changed
their meanings, hiding their principles in headings with a purely symbolic value.
I’m talking about the Secret Master (already
mentioned in Esonet), Perfect Master, Private Secretary
or the Unknown Superior. We use only the metaphoric
aspect of these words; they are therefore turned into words without an initiatory
meaning. A secret master or an unknown superior are not characters wearing a
hood, but inner guides of mental levels. In other words, the inner guides are
the sense of the subtle conscience (super-consciousness) and the chakra that
together affect (positively) the mind.
In order to ‘travel’ inside us we must know our spaces of conscience
that are usually inaccessible because they are too deep or subtle.
There aren’t many indications on how to find an inner master; the wisest
thing to do is to rely on an exterior master, a guide,
an expert that has already walked along that path. He will work as a mirror
(initiatory speculum) in order to allow the neophyte to recognize himself and
see what he really is, not what he thinks he is.
The truth is harsh, though, and not many can bear it. Furthermore, the world
is packed with mystifiers and bad teachers. It’s a difficult task and
we need a lot of intuition and common sense to avoid deceit.
When the aspirant advances he must recognize himself as a physical image (type
of attitude) and then as a mental figure (I am what I think). He learns that
only by transforming his mental structures he can change himself. A first metamorphosis
is necessary to communicate with the exterior master
and understand the teachings he gives.
The exterior master has the function to provide the missing link between the
aspirant’s mind and his superior Ego; on its turn, the latter provides
the missing link with the soul, which is the real master.
At this point we must pay attention to how the connecting bridges are built;
it would be more appropriate, actually, to call them mental and
spiritual reflections.
The exterior master compensates for the lack of an inner master; he takes
care of the growth of the aspirant until he reaches the level of minor initiate.
The link with the Ego (the first occult master) and then with the soul (the
inner master) will make any exterior support superfluous.
The soul is the only one to communicate with a true Master.
The true disciple is the soul.
The aspirant is its shadow until he becomes a lesser initiate.
After the contact with the Ego the Initiate’s mind is developed exponentially,
because it becomes the reflection of the soul.
The mind is not enlightened because it ‘ascends’ towards the soul,
but because the conscience of the soul ‘descends’ in the mind.
The soul is the direct reflection of the spirit called monad.
The inner master it’s us at a higher level. We can call super-consciousness
the entity that guides us towards the Pure Reason without ever replacing
it.
Characteristics of an Instructor
The exterior master (instructor) accomplishes his tasks in an impersonal way
through binding criteria and principles, because they are part of a Rule that
he represents. As in the scientific field, in the initiatory one as well it
is not difficult to distinguish between the people who freely interpret a principle
from those who apply it. If we are looking for a master, either
big or small, the method ruling the contact is always the same:
«…it is not the pupil to choose the instructor (or the Master).
It is the instructor (or the Master) to choose the disciple…» There
comes a time when someone shows you how to ‘arrange’ what you are
doing, very simply although skillfully. This is the first day of instruction.
It often happens so lightly that it doesn’t seem to have happened at all.
A simple encounter, a touch, a word and … by recognizing you will
be recognized.
The instructor formulates principles and ideas with simplicity, joining their
verbal form and their meanings until he reveals the hidden combination that
opens the ‘mystery’ under the eyes of the neophyte. Most of all
he knows what he teaches.
He doesn’t use mysteric words; he is neither folkloric nor he attracts
attention. He seems strict because he doesn’t give space to the fantastic
games of a childish mind that must grow up leaving behind the pastimes it enjoys.
This is not because of usefulness or prestige but in order to achieve the ideal
initiatory progress in the humankind. He uses impersonal, therefore realistic,
judgments. He doesn’t surrender to pleasure or non pleasure, because he
doesn’t want to develop opinions but the principles of the initiatory
science. It would be nice to keep following the wave of this thought.
Other aspects wait for us in order to reach the last and unique goal called
“Initiatory synthesis”.
Athos A. Altomonte