Q: Jesus says to his disciples of yesterday’s Church as of today’s: “Who’s listening to you is listening to me, who despises you despises me. So who despises me despises who sent me”.
Dear Mr. Altomonte, by despising the Church you come to despise God. Why are you doing this?

A: Dear Friend, I don’t despise Jesus, that I recognize as “Master of Masters”, but I point at Catholic Church. The Church is just a model of intolerant temporal sovereignty that contrasts the spiritual Principle recommended by former Christians.

Catholic Church doesn’t represent Christianity, but only its absolutism. As a son of a compromise between Roman imperial power (see Constantine) and the various monarchies whose crimes it blessed, it is still subject to the lies of its own history. Its main representative’s “edifying excuses” (not agreed by most of the ecclesial hierarchy) are not enough to square accounts with a past that bleeds of fratricidal wars.

The only thing still to say is that too many “current religions” are doing the same liberty-destroying mistakes which the head of Roman Church is begging the world for. But that’s not enough. All Catholicism needs to disown its errors with no half measures and without taking with the left hand what it gives with the right.

Pope Luciani, a man deserving the highest praise, was asking himself how to free His Church from all horrors committed against Woman, often considered even without soul.

The ridiculous misogyny of theocracy and the stupid arrogance of “male gender” have been an obstacle to the progress of half the human race: the female one.

It’s a “moral isolation” that is conditioned by the Marian image of an asexual Woman with no human features. So the only woman accepted by theocracy is an alien Woman.
And you’re saying that all this comes to praise God! Come on!
Best regards

Q: …Catholic Church is… a both divine and human society…

A: Dear Friend, from your point of view you’re quite right. But after so many signs of humanity, many people are still waiting for something divine, too often mistaken with TV programmes. Then I agree with you: Roman Church is a human society. Too much human, I could say. But this doesn’t mean that we can “mix good and bad”.

So let’s save the worshippers’ base, but a dissent remains to go against a “top of theocratic hierarchy” that is spiritually enlightened only in its supposed infallibility. But often this is contradicted by the frailty of its human nature.
We have to tell “Christians”, followers of Christ, from Catholics, followers of those unenlightened tops that today still practise heathen and superstitious rites.

Finally, I appeal to Reason and espouse what Voltaire said: «even if I don’t agree with you, I will always fight for you to express your ideas».

Dear Fabio, how many of those “top personalities” are ready to follow an assertion of freedom of that kind? Very few, I think, quite no one.

That’s the “difference” telling the intellectual from the subdued to those hierarchies called in Dante’s Inferno: the fierce she-wolf of Rome.

I’ll end up with something that many believers, and me too, use to think:
Universal Religion isn’t submitted to a Dogma, but comes from a free inner conviction!
The religious Dogma is a soul prison. Whoever asserts the Dogma, knows he doesn’t know, and he knows it well, so he lies to himself and to others.

Now I think we can close our debate: everybody may be in peace on his way.

Best regards

Esonet Editorial Staff